MoeIssuesoftheDay.blogspot.com

Say hello!!!!!!!

Write us at: mvl270@yahoo.com

Friday, June 24, 2016

Saturday, June 25, 2016
Say hello!!!!!!!Write us at: mvl270@yahoo.com


Residents are Leaving This State in DROVES Because of Exorbitant Taxes

Residents in the state of California – particularly the Bay Area – are finding that high taxes, housing costs, and a generally high cost of living are forcing them out of the state. The housing costs and high taxes have prompted a net outward migration from the state, meaning that there are more people leaving the state than are coming in. In fact, according to the state’s finance department, during the year ending June 30, there were 61,100 more people who moved out of the state than moved in. The Mercury News reported that “the so-called ‘net outward migration’ was the largest since 2011, when 63,300 more people fled California than entered.”

Dan Hamilton – the economics director with the Economics Forecasting Center at California Lutheran University – told The Mercury News:
“The main factors are housing costs in many parts of the state, including coastal regions of California such as the Bay Area… California has seen negative outward migration to other states for 22 of the last 25 years.”
A moving consultant Scott McElfresh attributed California’s mass exodus to the cost of living and high taxes:
“They are tired of the expense of living here. They are tired of the state of California and the endless taxes here. People are getting soaked every time they turn around.”
The Federation of Tax Administrators ranks California as the “top taxer with a 12.3 percent rate, unless you make more than $1 million and have to pay 13.3 percent.”
About a third of those surveyed in a recent poll said that they’d like to move out of the state soon. This is one of those unintended consequences of implementing high taxes. In theory, having higher taxes is supposed to mean that the government will be able to raise more money. In reality, it means that people want to leave and find another state that doesn’t burden them as much with trying to extract more from their hard-earned income.



Americans Reject Elites on National Security

In a stunning new survey, Matt Towery, Jr., head of Opinion Savvy, discovered that a majority of the American people oppose the national security policies of the elites.

The implications of this survey for the upcoming presidential election and Senate races could be extraordinary.

Towery had the courage to ask more politically incorrect questions than I have ever seen in one survey.

The results are heavily in favor of defending Americans from danger and against political correctness when dealing with Islamic supremacism and Sharia law. By margins of 5-1 or even 10-1, depending on the question, Americans repudiate the Clinton-Obama policies of weakness and political correctness.

“The results indicate that Americans' views are somewhat at odds with the current model of national security, particularly with regard to screening visitors to the United States,” Towery said. “The survey contacted registered voters on the evenings of June 19th and 20th on their landline telephones and mobile devices. As with all of our surveys, the final data was weighted for several demographic variables to reflect the composition of the electorate.”
In all, the survey results reveal the extent of the alienation between the American people and the political elites on national security.

For example, 67 percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the United States’ effort to fight terrorism, compared to just 27 percent who are satisfied. The intensity of this disapproval is reflected in the fact that 53 percent of respondents say they are very dissatisfied and less than 10 percent are very satisfied. This is a stunning 5-1 margin opposed to the status quo.
By 70 percent to 14 percent, Americans believe that visitors to the United States should be screened for supporters of Sharia law. This is another 5-1 ratio.

Among the 70 percent who believe in screening, 80 percent would block them from entering the United States and only 8.7 percent would admit them. This is more than a 9-1 margin. Thus 56 percent of all Americans oppose supporters of Sharia law entering the country.

Americans are very hard-line about U.S. citizens who swear allegiance to ISIS and other terrorist groups. By 83 percent to 8, Americans support stripping such people of their American citizenship.

While millions of Americans support the Second Amendment and their constitutional right to bear arms, they do not think that these rights apply to suspected terrorists. According to the survey, 88 percent of Americans believe suspected terrorists should not be allowed to buy weapons, compared to only 3.3 percent who disagree.

While Americans overwhelmingly believe that suspected terrorists should not have access to guns, they do not support banning guns for ordinary citizens. Even so-called “assault” weapons have very significant support, with 44 percent opposing a ban on them and 49 percent approving the proposal. Given the much greater intensity among Second Amendment supporters, it is no wonder that these measures keep failing in Congress (the Democrats’ current “sit-in” notwithstanding).

This poll begins to outline a new American consensus on defending America and decisively repudiating the elite’s weaknesses.

It is worth your reading and thinking about in detail for yourself.

Your Friend,
Newt

Suspect in death of Jon Benet Ramsey arrested on child porn charges
BY TRIBUNE MEDIA WIRE
One of the suspects in the death of JonBenet Ramsey on Christmas night nearly 20 years ago was charged earlier this week in Colorado on suspicion of downloading child pornography.

Gary Oliva, 52, was arrested after Boulder police received a tip from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, local television station KMGH reported.

Oliva, who investigators believe may have been near the Ramsey’s home on the night she was killed in 1996, has been considered one of several suspects in her death over the years.

“We haven’t ruled him in or out in connection with the Ramsey case,” Sarah Huntley, a spokeswoman for the City of Boulder, told KMGH.

Police found a photo of Ramsey during a 2000 arrest of Oliva, who admitted to having an obsession with the young beauty queen, the television station reported.

Following his most recent arrest, Oliva was charged Tuesday with two counts of attempted sexual exploitation of a child and one count of sexual exploitation of a child, KMGH reported.

Olivia allegedly downloaded 22 sexually explicit images of children less than 10 years of age.

The IP address used to download the images was “very similar” to where Oliva was reregistered as a sex offender in October 2015, the television station reported citing court documents.

He was being held on a $10,000 bond, according to KMGH.
GOP Establishment Leaders Are Missing the Point of Trumps Rise in Popularity. Here's Why We Really Like Trump
A poll showed that 90 percent of the chairpersons of the state Republican parties found their party's presidential candidate's plans for governance "simplistic.”

The chairpersons also opposed the candidate because he had "no depth” in governing and "no experience” in foreign affairs.

One of the state chairmen said that the candidate's intellect was "thinner than spit on a slate rock.” Only one Republican senator supported him.

Two recent Republican presidents dismissed the candidate as a "lightweight.” One of them said the candidate had a "penchant for offering simplistic solutions to hideously complex problems” and made fun of his "prematurely orange” hair.

Many establishment Republicans also were wary of the presidential candidate because he was a Democrat for a long time and had only relatively recently become a Republican.

I know what you're thinking -- "yeah, but that was several months ago. Republicans are coalescing behind Donald Trump now.”

Guess again. All those above comments were NOT about Donald Trump. They were, in fact, about Ronald Reagan.

Yes, The Gipper was, to say the least, disrespected by the Republican establishment.

The powers that be in the Republican Party in the late 1970s disdained the non-politician, the man who was more interested in changing the United States for the better than endlessly compromising with Democrats.

** FILE ** In this file photo from Nov. 1, 1992, former President Bill Clinton and current Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., dance on stage during a "Get-Out-The-Vote" rally at the Brendan Byrne Arena in East Rutherford, N.J. Sunday night, Nov. 1, 1992. (AP Photo/Susan Ragan, File)

New D'Souza movie hits Bill and Hillary as 'two depraved crooks'


Conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza is releasing his new movie, "Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party," in Cleveland during the Republican National Convention with a warning about Bill and Hillary Clinton:"Imagine how worse things could get if these two depraved crooks return to the White House."
Accompanied by his book Hillary's America from Regnery Publishing, the movie will be unveiled at July 17 red carpet event in Cleveland and released nationally July 22 just received a PG-13 rating.

A trailer was just made available and it shows how D'Souza plans to highlight the Democratic Party's past ties to the KKK, slavery and racism, and show Clinton's controversies, including Benghazi and foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State.

"This eye opening film sheds light on the Democrats transition from pro slavery to pro enslavement, how Hillary Clinton's political mentor was, literally, a cold blooded gangster, and how the Clintons and other Democrats see foreign policy not in terms of national interest, but in terms of personal profit. Hillary's America will expose how their plan is simply to steal America," said a release provided to Secrets.

"This film cannot be ignored by voters during this election," said D'Souza. "What this film explains is the intent and corruption of one party and one person and their desire to steal the most valuable entity in the world today: the United States of America," he added.


"This eye opening film sheds light on the Democrats transition from pro slavery to pro enslavement, how Hillary Clinton's political mentor was, literally, a cold blooded gangster, and how the Clintons and other Democrats see foreign policy not in terms of national interest, but in terms of personal profit. Hillary's America will expose how their plan is simply to steal America," said a release provided to Secrets.

"This film cannot be ignored by voters during this election," said D'Souza. "What this film explains is the intent and corruption of one party and one person and their desire to steal the most valuable entity in the world today: the United States of America," he added. Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com


G’ day Ciao…….
Moe & Helen  Lauzier

Thursday, June 23, 2016

Friday, June 24, 2016

Say hello!!!!!!!Write us at: mvl270@yahoo.com


ALL Of A Sudden....Seven Short Years Have
Passed!
Before Obama there was virtually no outlandish presence of Islam in America
• All of a sudden, Islam is taught in schools. Christianity and the bible are banned in schools.

• All of a sudden we must allow prayer rugs everywhere and allow for Islamic prayer in schools, airports and businesses.

• All of a sudden we must stop serving pork in prisons.

• All of a sudden we are inundated with law suits by Muslims who are offended by American culture.

• All of a sudden we must allow burkas to be worn everywhere even though you have no idea who or what is covered up under them.

• All of a sudden Muslims are suing employers and refusing to do their jobs if they personally deem it conflicts with Sharia Law.

• All of a sudden the Attorney General of the United States vows to prosecute anyone who engages in "anti-Muslim speech".

• All of a sudden, Jihadists who engage in terrorism and openly admit they acted in the name of Islam and ISIS, are emphatically declared they are NOT Islamic by our leaders and/or their actions are determined NOT to be terrorism, but other nebulous terms like 'workplace violence."

• All of a sudden, it becomes Policy that Secular Middle East dictators that were benign or friendly to the West, must be replaced by Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood.

• All of a sudden our troops are withdrawn from Iraq and the middle east, giving rise to ISIS.

• All of a sudden, America has reduced its nuclear stockpiles to 1950 levels, as Obama's stated goal of a nuke-free America by the time he leaves office continues uninterrupted.

• All of a sudden, a deal with Iran must be made at any cost, with a pathway to nuclear weapons and HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars handed over to fund their programs.

• All of a sudden America APOLOGIZES to Muslim states and sponsors of terror worldwide for acts of aggression, war and sabotage THEY perpetrate against our soldiers.

• All of a sudden, the American Navy is diminished to 1917 Pre-World War I levels of only 300 ships. The Army is at pre-1940 levels. The Air Force scraps 500 planes and planned to retire the use of the A-10 Thunderbolt close air support fighter.  A further drawdown of another 40,000 military personnel is in progress.

• All of a sudden half of our aircraft carriers are recalled for maintenance by Obama rendering the Atlantic unguarded, NONE are in the Middle East.

• All of a sudden Obama has to empty Guantanamo Bay of captured Jihadists and let them loose in Jihad-friendly Islamic states.  He demands to close the facility.

• All of a sudden America will negotiate with terrorists and trade FIVE Taliban commanders for a deserter and Jihad sympathizer.

• All of a sudden there is no money for American poor, disabled veterans, jobless Americans, hungry Americans, or displaced Americans but there is endless money for Obama's "Syrian refugee" resettlement programs.

• All of sudden there is an ammunition shortage in the USA.

• All of a sudden, the most important thing for Obama to do after a mass shooting by two Jihadists, is disarm American Citizens.

All of a sudden, the President of the United States cannot attend the Christian Funerals of a Supreme Court Justice and a former First Lady because of previous (seemingly unimportant) commitments.

All of a sudden,

I’m sick to my stomach.  I’m not sure the majority of Americans recognize the seriousness of the situation and how much “progress” has been made by Islam these last 7 years, a very brief time compared to a 75 year lifetime!

If you agree, be strong enough to at least forward this to a few friends.


Paper Reveals Shocking Reason Behind Trump’s Muslim Ban



Paper Reveals Shocking Reason Behind Trump’s Muslim Ban
The Washington Post’s headline promised a big scoop: Inside Donald Trump’s Strategic Decision to Target Muslims.
Oh no, this could be bad. The Post, still smarting after being barred from covering the campaign, was about to get their revenge. They were going to blow the lid off Trump’s sharp criticism of radical Islam. Do they have evidence that it’s a purely political show at odds with the candidate’s real feelings on the matter? The fallout could be catastrophic – a bad story at a time when Trump can scarcely afford one.
We click the story with apprehension. Man, this could be a nightmare.
And the shocking reason behind the “strategic decision to target Muslims” is quickly revealed:
“My perspective on this is very much formed by 9/11,” said Trump’s one-time political director Michael Glassner. “I worked at the World Trade Center. Those people were radical Islamists and they were trying to kill me and they killed 87 of my colleagues.”
…oh.
“The San Bernardino terrorist attack, I think, put an even brighter light on this question about who are these people, how are they getting in, who is checking them, what are their intentions?” Glassner said.
…hmm.
So the Washington Post’s big scoop is that Trump’s suspicion of Muslims was formed by the worst terrorist attack in our nation’s history and strengthened by the attacks in Paris and San Bernardino – all of which were also carried out by Muslims.
Well then.
They go on to quote a CAIR member, who says, “It’s that deliberate, systematic targeting of the Muslim community that really sends chills down my spine.”
Yeah…that’s so much more “chilling” than these attacks that kill 3,000 people, then 14, then more than a hundred, then another 49. Lord knows, we can’t make Muslims feel uncomfortable. They’re our greatest allies in the fight against terrorism, don’t you know? Despite the fact that they don’t seem to have done much of anything to stop it in the last 15 years. Despite the fact that we can barely get Muslim countries to join us in the fight against ISIS. Despite the fact that the only thing Islamic leaders seem capable of talking about after each of these attacks is “Islamophobia.” But sure, sure, they’re important allies. Whatever you say.
Look, there’s no question that Trump’s Muslim ban is an extraordinary measure. An unfortunate measure, perhaps. A measure of last resort.
But the time has come for measures of last resort. How high does the death toll need to go before we act? 5,000? 10,000? At what point do Americans finally say, you know what, we might have a bigger problem here than Islamophobia?
The shocking reason behind Trump’s proposals is not hate or bigotry or some cynical appeal to nativists. It’s common sense. And in a country overrun with tree-hugging liberals, idiocy is celebrated and common sense is “chilling.”
And that’s why we’re in the trouble we’re in.


Trump's VP Front-runner: Sen. Sessions of Alabama

Image: Trump's VP Front-runner: Sen. Sessions of Alabama    


With less than a month to go before the Republican National Convention that will make Donald Trump's nomination for president official, sources close to the billionaire candidate told Newsmax Wednesday that his top choice, at the moment, as his vice presidential running mate is Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama.


Requesting anonymity, the sources told us that Trump feels personally comfortable with swashbuckling conservative Sessions, 69, who was the first member of the Senate to endorse his candidacy and who frequently speaks with him.


The square Sessions seems to fit many square holes for Trump: he's conservative and nails down the party's right flank, he endorsed Trump early and has been extremely loyal, he has Washington legislative experience — a key requirement — and importantly, he can be totally trusted never to criticize Trump no matter what he might say in the coming months.


Senate Judiciary Committee member Sessions has already had a "strong impact." His immigration legislation has already been the cornerstone of trumps Mexico and deportation policies. Sessions played a key role in creating Trump's surprise list of a dozen Supreme Court appointees he would consider. The list pleased conservatives and was particularly responsible for Trump naming Judge William Pryor (who succeeded Sessions as state attorney general of Alabama) as a top choice, a source said.


Moreover, judged the fifth-most-conservative U.S. senator by the "National Journal," and with lifetime ratings of 96 percent from the American Conservative Union and 80 percent from the Heritage Action Fund, insiders say by picking sessions Trump will be able to stake positions more in the center and even to the left of Hillary Clinton.


"The selection will reassure conservatives," said Franklin & Marshall College Professor G. Terry Madonna, considered the premier pollster in Pennsylvania. "Sessions is one of the more conservative senators — that should be reassuring to economic conservatives and the religious right."


Among issues where Sessions has been a leader on the right have been as a hard-line opponent of illegal immigration, Obamacare, and abortion. He was a leading proponent of tax cuts under the George W. Bush administration and helped lead the fight against repeal of the "Don't ask, don't tell" rule regarding gays in the military.


Sessions did support the Iraq War, which Trump now denounces Clinton for backing. But he also never disagrees with Trump in public, which "the Donald" is said to appreciate.


"Jeff is solid," former Sen. Jon Kyl (R.-Ariz.), who worked closely with Sessions on the Senate Judiciary Committee for many years, told Newsmax Wednesday as rumors of his possible selection mounted.


Kyl also told us that "Sen. Sessions is well grounded in all of the major areas and would be prepared to step in should there be a need."


He was referring to another reason Sessions backers close to Trump feel the senator is now leading for the Number Two spot: the long-standing Republican Party tradition of an "outsider-insider" national ticket.


Going back to 1868, when retired Gen. and first-time candidate Ulysses Grant was nominated for president and tapped House Speaker Schuyler Colfax for vice president, the GOP has had a history of almost always running a seasoned political "pro" for vice president when the nominee for the top job is a political outsider or non-office-holder.
Gen. Dwight Eisenhower was matched with known anti-communist Sen. Richard Nixon in 1952 and, more recently, "anti-Washington" nominees Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush turned to "insiders" George H.W. Bush and Dick Cheney, respectively, as running mates.


In Sessions, Trump — who has never held elected office before — would have a running mate who has been active in politics since he was in the Young Republicans at Huntingdon College in Alabama back when the GOP in the South was in the proverbial telephone booth.


Tapped by President Reagan to be U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Alabama in 1981, University of Alabama Law School graduate and U.S. Army Reserve Capt. Sessions developed a reputation as "the Southern Giuliani" for his successful prosecution record.


When Reagan appointed Sessions to the U.S. District Court in 1986, civil rights and liberal groups mobilized charged he had made insensitive comments about the civil rights movement — comments, Sessions insisted, were made "in jest" and which he was apologized for.


But supporters could never muster the one additional vote they needed in the Senate Judiciary Committee to break a 9-9 tie and report the Sessions nomination to the Senate. The nomination was withdrawn.


Sessions went on to be elected state attorney general in 1994 and, two years later, was easily elected to the Senate seat relinquished by the political actor pivotal to thwarting his nomination to the bench: Democrat Howell Heflin, who after saying he would support Sessions on the Judiciary Committee, ended up voting "no."


One unique part of a Trump-Sessions team-up that Democrats are sure to bring up is that, with Trump recently turning 70 and Sessions turning 70 in December, theirs would be the oldest national ticket of a major party in history. However, Trump is said not to care about this and it would seem that a Democratic nominee who is 69 would not try to make this an issue.


Plus, reports suggests the Trump will not name his vice president shall not many early, but wants to save it for the convention as a major touch point in his political coronation.


While friends of Trump acknowledge that Sessions is the current front runner they also admit that it's not concrete until it's announced. Other candidates that make the shortlist or Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona, Gov. Mary Fallin of Oklahoma, Gen. Mike Flynn, former director of the defense intelligence agency, and former House Speaker Newt



Baby McPoutyFace Dem’s
Throw Congressional Hissy Fit
by Chuck Muth
a
The question the gun grabbers keep asking in response to the Orlando nightclub massacre by a wacko ISIS sympathizer is why anyone needs an “assault rifle.”  The simple and obvious answer, of course, is…
Because the bad guys have them!  Duh.
To paraphrase the old Mexican Proverb made famous by actor Clint Eastwood inA Fistful of Dollars, when a man with a .45 meets a man with an AR-15, the man with the .45 is a dead man.
But that hasn't stopped the Democrat gun control jihadists in Congress from exploiting the Orlando tragedy to again pursue their anti-Second Amendment agenda.
At what I can only imagine was a high-level strategy confab of liberal congressional leaders, long-toothed race-hustling Rep. John Lewis – obviously trying to relive his glory days as a 1960s-era civil rights agitator – appears to have channeled “Otter” from the movie Animal House.
Lewis: “I think we have to go all out. I think this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part!”
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: “And we're just the guys to do it!”
Thus, on the evening of June 22, 2013, a date that surely will not go down in history, a gaggle of elected Democrats from the United States House of Representatives launched a…sit-in.
Talk about a really futile and stupid gesture!
These Baby McPoutyFace Dem’s then proceeded to shout down House Speaker Paul Ryan like a bunch of thuggish union picketers when he attempted to actually conduct the people’s business.  It was an epic hissy-fit/temper-tantrum absent only a threat to hold their collective breaths until their goofy faces turned blue.
At one point, somebody sent the spoiled brats some pizzas.  What they should have been sent were some pacifiers.  What an embarrassment.
Meanwhile, on the campaign trail…
“Crooked” Hillary Clinton should be required to declare the Mainstream Media as in-kind campaign donors on her FEC report for their collective false reporting on Donald Trump.  The latest example: The tabloid headlines claiming Trump “questioned” or “attacked” Crooked’s religion.
Um, no, he didn’t.
He questioned and attacked the MEDIA for devoting far more attention to the religious beliefs and practices of Republican candidates than it does of Democrat candidates, making the accurate observation that, as a result, the public knows comparatively little about Clinton’s faith.
Hillary should also be required to declare Republicans such as Mitt Romney,Paul Ryan and Marco Rubio as in-kind donors for continuing to sabotage Trump’s campaign with their incessant yipping at his heels and regurgitating the Democrats’ talking points about “racism” and “mysogynism.”
Trump’s correct: They should just shut up.
Or maybe these cry-babies should just imitate the Baby McPoutyFace Dem’s and conduct their own hissy-fit sit-in on the floor of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland next month.


DEATH WISH OR DEATH THREAT?


For new readers, I have three children: Kristen (16), Jenna (13) and C.J. (9).  


And now that you now that, you'll understand what this left-wing nutjob is talking about in this tweet he posted this morning...

a 2

But remember, it's Donald Trump and his supporters who are supposedly spreading "hate."  I mean, the media tells us that every day, right?


I'm guessing maybe I should report this one to authorities...









G’ day Ciao…….
Moe & Helen  Lauzier

About Me

My Photo
As of 1-1-2016 our blog is by Helen and me. We will attempt to provide adult oriented issues and topics.

Blog Archive

issues