In politics, a bold lie is considered a suicide play. If you cannot convince enough people of the veracity of your statement which is in actuality a lie, you are dead politically. The bigger the lie and the issue and the greater likelihood of political death for the prevaricator.
In today’s world, a good example of a suicide play is Nancy Pelosi’s whopper of telling the world the CIA had lied to her and other members of congress in 2003 about the use of waterboarding. She has signed up seven other sacrificial lambs to stand by her remarks the CIA lied and she’s telling the truth.
In baseball we would call the runner out if the bunt fails to allow safe passage to the plate for him. In this case the Congresswoman’s wheels are spinning everywhere and the public (umpire) in this case is about to call her out.
8 --- Since I grew up first as a Boston Braves fan, later a Red Sox fan, Patriots fan, Bruins fan and except for the Cetlics, the fan of teams that broke your heart time after time. I guess my sentiments are instinctively with the underdog.
We hear always from politicians how they are for the underdog, how they respect the person who overcomes personal handicaps, who perseveres when others are content to quit when facing seemingly overwhelming odds.
Dr. Martin Luther King was attacked by conservatives because he was shaking up social order. He was called a communist fellow traveler and worse. The FBI and other Federal agencies including the then attorney general listened and made jokes about tapes made by the Bureau and other fed agents of King involved in uncompromising situations with young women. The fact was what they were doing was smearing his character in order to overshadow his excellent and necessary work in civil rights.
Smearing the opposition has been a blood sport in Washington. When Judge Robert Bork was nominated to the Supreme Court he was smeared by the brother of the attorney general who smeared Dr. King along with J. Edgar Hoover. Later Clarence Thomas faced the same sort of smears.
President Obama has nominated Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. She presided over a case now overturned by the Supreme Court concerning the promotion of firemen in New Haven, Connecticut. Her judicial judgment has been called into question in that case. One of the central figures in the case, a New Haven firefighter Frank Ricci. He is a dyslexic man who needed to do far more than most to prepare for the promotion exam in New Haven and was the lead in the case recently decided by the high Court.
Based on information on Ricci’s past, he is a fighter for his rights. He doesn’t appear to accept being told he is unable to achieve certain things because of his handicap. To the contrary he accepts obstacles to his success as challenges to be met.
Ricci has been asked to attend the senate hearings of Judge Sotomayor next week. What makes all this so unnerving is the trained guns of the smear makers on Capitol Hill are aimed directly at Ricci. His character is now being called into question because he , in 1995, fought for his rights in a case concerning Ricci and Middletown, Connecticut.
This from McClatchy Newspapers in Connecticut:
"Frank Ricci's troubled and litigious work history," the liberal advocacy group People for the American Way drew reporters' attention to Ricci's past. Other advocates for Sotomayor have discreetly urged journalists to pursue similar story lines.
"Specifically, the advocates have zeroed in on an earlier 1995 lawsuit Ricci filed claiming the city of New Haven discriminated against him because he's dyslexic. The advocates cite other Hartford Courant stories from the same era recounting how Ricci was fired by a fire department in Middletown, Conn., allegedly, Ricci said at the time, because of safety concerns he raised.
"The Middletown-area fire department was subsequently fined for safety violations, but the Connecticut Department of Labor dismissed Ricci's retaliation complaint.
"No People for the American Way officials could be reached Friday to speak on the record about the press campaign."
Of course the courageous People for the American Way couldn’t face questions about their partisan hatchet job.
9 --- Democrat congressman Charles Rangel failed to pay taxes on at least $75,000 in rental income from his luxury beachfront villa in the Caribbean because he was confused. Gee, what a bright bulb Mr. Rangel is. He’s perfect fro the tax writing committee in congress. He ranks up there in integrity with Barney Frank and Massachusetts congressman Ed Markey.
Rangel is chairman of the powerful tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, one of the three most powerful men in the US House of Representatives, even more powerful than the flame of my existence, my congressman Bawney Fwank.
Yes, old Rangel (and he is old at 82 though he has a trophy wife who is a felon) is now pushing for a half trillion in tax increases next year. Oh what a man. He promises it will only come from the rich. Problem there is every Democrat in Washington wants to increase taxes on “the rich”. Hell, before they all get in on the act there will be no rich to tax and fleece or invents or be creative and begin the process of helping the economy recover.
Talk about the guy who ate the hen laying the golden eggs.
10 --- What’s the difference between Sonia Sotomayor and Harriet Miers? Not much.

11 --- To listen to Obama suck-ups the meeting between Barack Obama and Pope Benedict XVI was one of only slight differences. The reports from the press in Rome is the Pope was unbending in his defense of the unborn.
President Obambi tried to get the Pontiff to agree on many social issues. I suspect he ws trying to get what seemed like a meeting where friends only disagreed on peripheral subjects. Not so fast, fast talker. The Pope takes the abortion issue very seriously, unlike the mamby pamby Jesuits at Notre Dame.
You’re simply lucky the Pope will not disclose just how badly he ate your lunch you faker. On the subject of abortion I could et your lunch but the dim bulbs surrounding you would never let you face even the likes of menial old me. I would loe to see you face off with Dr. Mildred Jefferson, who made it on her own without a bunch of phonies paving her way at Harvard Medical to become a top notch surgeon. After she finished with you he would call Sarah Palin to find some place to hide in Alaska.
By the way, we keep hearing Americans favor abortion on demand. That a lot of bull.
Here’s some of the findings of th latest Moral Compass survey:
*** 86% of Americans would significantly restrict abortion.
*** 60% of Americans would limit abortion to cases of rape, incest or to save the life of a mother – or would not allow it at all.
*** 53% of Americans believe abortion does more harm than good to a woman in the long term.
*** 79% of Americans support conscience exemptions on abortion for health care workers. This includes 64% of those who identify as strongly pro-choice.
*** 69% of Americans think that it is appropriate for religious leaders to speak out on abortion.
*** 59% say religious leaders have a key role to play in the abortion debate.
*** 80% of Americans believe that laws can protect both the health of the woman and the life of the unborn. This includes 68% of those who identified as strongly pro-choice.
Additionally, the data showed that since October nearly every demographic sub-group had moved toward the pro-life position except for non-practicing Catholics and men under 45 years of age.
“The data shows that the American people are placing an ever increasing value on human life,” said Supreme Knight Carl Anderson. “Far from the great divide that most people think exists when it comes to the abortion debate, there is actually a great deal of common ground. Most Americans are unhappy with the unrestricted access to abortion that is the legacy of Roe vs. Wade, and pundits and elected leaders should take note of the fact that agreement on abortion need not be limited to the fringes of the debate and issues like adoption or pre-natal care. The American people have reached a basic consensus, and that consensus is at odds with the unrestricted access to abortion that is the legacy of Roe.”
The survey of 1,223 Americans was conducted May 28 – 31 and has a margin of error of +/-3%.
May I admit, that when Roe v. Wade was announced, based on the commentaries in most of the newspapers of the day, I was pro-choice. I agreed with the Supreme Court.
The original decision was sold to us as a dealing only with first trimester babies. That they were not viable or fully human yet. What a bunch of bull I believed.
I met Dr. Mildred Jefferson, the only woman outside my wife I can say I love with all my heart and soul since Helen feels as strongly about her as do I. Jeff taught me how drastically wrong I was. It was tough for an old chauvinist to accept just how wrong he was on this issue. She taught me how life begins the moment of conception.
Please accept this old chauvinist’s confession Mildred Jefferson was right from the beginning on the issue of abortion and she is by far my superior on most issues.
I love you Jeff. Thank you for your faith in me and your patience. Dealing with this, as my grandfather used to refer to me as a, “TĂȘte de pioche“. Head of genuine granite.
12 --- Just a random thought --- With all the spending on a million things does Barack Obama really believe we are dumb enough (or even our congress) to believe we can afford his joke of a medical policy? Do we really think the government can somehow insure fifteen million illegal aliens along with possibly another fifteen million who would rather spend their own money on other things. Those without the assets to pay for their own insurance get whatever care they really need and will never be squeezed to pay for it.
It’s time to put our own house in order and make certain we are not paying for those who chose not to be covered.
There is no reason we should be paying for those who chose not to pay or for those here illegally. Health care here is the best in the world, even for the poorest of our Americans. There is no reason for us to emulate the phony policies of Europe and Canada.
(Parenthetically, we have friends from Canada who return home each year long enough for them to have free medical care here in the USA. They acknowledge our care si far superior to anything they could receive in Canada.

13 --- NY Times says it may charge for access to its web site. Bye, bye, NYT.
Noe it's off to the White Mountains for a couple of days.
Ciao…….Moe